0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º´¿ø À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ °£È£¡¤°£º´ÅëÇÕ¼­ºñ½ºº´µ¿ °£È£¾÷¹« ºÐ¼®

Analysis of Nursing Task in Integrated Nursing Care Ward by Hospital Type

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2022³â 28±Ç 2È£ p.131 ~ 141
KMID : 0614820220280020131
ÀÌ¿©Áø ( Yi Yeo-Jin ) - Hanyang University School of Nursing

ÀÓÇسª ( Lim Hae-Na ) - Hanyang University School of Nursing
±èÁö¹Ì ( Kim Ji-Mee ) - Dongnam Health University Department of Nursing
¼ÛÁ¤Èñ ( Song Jung-Hee ) - Ansan University Department of Nursing

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÅëÇÕ°£È£º´µ¿ÀÇ Á÷¹«Æ¯¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: 30°³ º´¿øÀÇ ÅëÇÕ°£È£º´µ¿¿¡ ±Ù¹«ÇÏ´Â °£È£»ç 388¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 31°³ »óÀ§¹üÁÖ(678¹®Ç×)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °£È£¾÷¹«ÀÇ Áß¿äµµ, ¼öÇà ºóµµ, ¾î·Á¿òÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °£È£¾÷¹«´Â º´¿ø À¯Çüº°·Î IPA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: IPA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø°ú Á¾ÇÕº´¿øÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, º´¿ø À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó ÀϹݰ£È£ÁßÀç, ¿µÀû°£È£ ¹× ÀÓÁ¾°£È£, °Ë»ç ½Ã °£È£ÀÇ ¾÷¹«¹üÁÖ´Â À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó ¿µ¿ª¹èÄ¡¿¡ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¡®À¯Áö¡¤°­È­ÇÒ ¾÷¹«¡¯¿¡´Â °£È£»çÁ¤, Åõ¾à ¹× ¼öÇ÷, ÀÔ¡¤Åð¿ø°ü¸®, Çù·Â ¹× Á¶Á¤ÀÇ 12°¡Áö ¾÷¹«¹üÁÖ°¡ Æ÷ÇԵǾú´Ù. ¡®°³¼±³ë·ÂÀ» ÁýÁßÇÒ ¾÷¹«¡¯¿¡´Â ÀÀ±Þ °£È£, °£È£ ±³À°, ÀÚ±â°è¹ßÀÇ 3°¡Áö ¾÷¹«¹üÁÖ°¡ ¼ÓÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¡®°úÀ×¼öÇà ¾÷¹«¡¯´Â ÁöÁöÀû Á¢ÃË, ȯ°æ °ü¸®, ¹°Ç°°ü¸®°¡ ¼ÓÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¡®¿ì¼±¼øÀ§°¡ ³·Àº ¾÷¹«¡¯¿¡´Â ÇàÁ¤ ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸®, ½Ã¼³ °ü¸® µî 10°¡Áö ¾÷¹«¹üÁÖ°¡ Æ÷ÇԵǾú´Ù.

°á·Ð: °£È£»çµéÀº ¾÷¹«¿¡ µû¶ó Áß¿äµµ¿Í ³­À̵µ¸¦ ´Ù¸£°Ô ÀνÄÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀϹݰ£È£ÁßÀç, ¿µÀû°£È£ ¹× ÀÓÁ¾°£È£, °Ë»ç ½Ã °£È£°¡ º´¿ø À¯Çü¿¡ µû¶ó ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¿µ¿ª¿¡ ¹èÄ¡µÇ¾î Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú´Â °£È£Á÷¹«¸¦ °ü¸®ÇÏ°í, Àη°ü¸®¸¦ °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀÚ·á°¡ µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the job characteristics of the integrated nursing care ward.

Methods: For 388 nurses working in the integrated nursing wards of 30 hospitals, the importance, performance frequency, and difficulty of nursing tasks were analyzed using 31 job categories (678 items). Nursing tasks were analyzed using Importance-Performance Analysis by hospital type.

Results: Tertiary hospitals and general hospitals were analyzed using Importance-Performance Analysis, and the categories of general nursing intervention, spiritual and end of life nursing, and nursing during examination differed by hospital type. Other tasks into the same categories. 'Keep up the Good Work' includes 12 tasks: nursing assessment, medication and blood transfusion, admission or discharge management, and cooperation and coordination. 'Concentrate Here' had three tasks: emergency care, education to nurses, self-development. 'Possible Overkill' included supportive contact, environmental management, and product management. 'Low Priority' has ten tasks, including administration and organization management, facility management.

Conclusions: Nurses had different perceptions of importance and difficulty according to the tasks. Nursing during the examination, general nursing intervention, spiritual nursing, and end-of-life nursing were placed in different domains according to hospital type. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the nursing tasks and plan to improve workforce management, reflecting these differences.
KeyWords
Áß¿äµµ,, ¼öÇ൵, ³­À̵µ, °£È£»ç, ¾÷¹« ºÐ¼®
Importance, Performance frequency, Difficulty, Nurses, Task analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed